Tommy Robinson convicted of harassing journalists, facing up to 10 years in prison

Evening Standard leads with the maximum potential prison term and presents the verdict as jurors convicting on both harassment charges causing fear of violence.

Belfast Telegraph matches the same headline framing about a possible up to 10-year sentence, but no additional summary details are provided.

Washington Times emphasizes the activist’s identity and describes the conviction as harassment of two British journalists.

The Independent foregrounds that social media posts are central to why journalists feared violence, while naming the specific publication involved.

RTE News leads with the basic outcome—conviction of harassment causing fear of violence—without further added context in the provided summary.

Daily Mail leads with its own reporters being intimidated, emphasizing jurors’ view of “bully-boy tactics” and linking the case to coverage of his “UK riots” background.

Daily Mail highlights courtroom characterisation and adds background about ‘bully-boy tactics’ and alleged links to previous UK riots coverage and a Cyprus holiday.

Herald Scotland stresses the fear of a potential ‘vigilante’ attack and names two Daily Mail journalists, adding that sentencing is set for December 16.

The Independent leads on the warning of potential jail time after the harassment conviction, emphasising the court process and the sentencing outlook rather than broader politics.

BBC News focuses on the core facts: guilty verdict, number of journalists, the defendant’s age, and the week-long trial at Southwark Crown Court.

Daily Express emphasises the jury process, noting deliberation time and majority size in reaching the guilty verdict.

Manchester Evening News frames the case as ‘retaliation’ connected to Daily Mail coverage and uses that framing in its lead.

Press Gazette leads with the guilty finding and repeats that Robinson will be sentenced on 16 December, also including his legal name.

The New York Times leads with the global framing and the real name, describing him as an anti-immigrant agitator while reporting the conviction.

Evening Standard leads with the guilty verdict and pairs it with the procedural detail that Robinson pleaded not guilty.

Evening Standard foregrounds investigative methods, stressing court evidence that Robinson hired private investigators to find the journalists’ addresses, framing the harassment as surveillance-driven.

Metro adds a behavioural courtroom detail, describing Robinson remaining motionless as the verdict is read.

The Mirror foregrounds the “bully-boy tactics” language and reiterates that the jury found guilt on two harassment counts causing fear of violence.

The Mirror adds a specific allegation detail in its framing, referring to Robinson telling journalists “I’m coming to get you.”

Belfast Telegraph provides a straightforward conviction headline, mirroring the core outcome found across other outlets.

Belfast Telegraph foregrounds the risk of a prison sentence for harassing two Daily Mail journalists, focusing early on the conviction at Southwark Crown Court and the looming punishment.

The Independent keeps the focus on the verdict and court timetable, leading with the guilty finding at Southwark Crown Court announced on Wednesday.

The Guardian highlights impact and safety, focusing on reporters and their families fleeing homes after “bullyboy” intimidation over their Daily Mail coverage.

Sky News presents a straightforward headline-style update, concentrating on the fact of the guilty verdict against Robinson and identifying the case as involving two MailOnline journalists.