A man accused of driving into independent MP Helen Haines, and allegedly striking her repeatedly with his vehicle, claims the incidents were not deliberate. Reports say he tells authorities and/or media that he panicked and that the initial hit was an accident.

Several outlets—Brisbane Times, The Age, and the Sydney Morning Herald—frame their coverage around the accused person’s assertion that it was entirely accidental or that he acted in a state of panic. Stuff.co.nz also highlights the denial of deliberate targeting, adding that police continue investigating whether the alleged attack was premeditated.

Across the reports, the central shared point is the accused person’s explanation: panic rather than intention. The main contextual difference is how much emphasis outlets place on the police investigation into premeditation, rather than only the defendant’s claim of accident.