A mistrial is declared in the murder trial of Lindsay Clancy after jurors cannot reach a unanimous verdict. In interviews following the deadlock, multiple outlets report that a single holdout juror, Michael P. Desronvil, blocked an acquittal related to an insanity defense and stood by his position during deliberations.

CBS News and Sky News report Desronvil says he “didn’t have any doubts,” while describing how his attempts to discuss different theories were cut off during deliberations. Other accounts, including The Guardian and Stuff.co.nz, state that the juror acknowledged or expressed reasonable doubt but still would not agree to acquit, according to the jury’s foreperson, Roni Carlson. Carlson says the holdout could not be persuaded to reach an insanity-related not-guilty verdict.

Several outlets also describe the tone of deliberations differently. The Guardian, Irish Mirror, and Daily Record cite jurors characterizing the holdout as “arrogant” and describing name-calling or yelling. Jerusalem Post and Fox News add that the holdout reportedly hires high-profile counsel and that the defense is pursuing a motion related to double jeopardy, amid public scrutiny of juror conduct.