LinkedIn is escalating efforts to reduce the reach of low-quality, AI-written “slop” content after users complained about generic, lengthy posts that lack personalization. Reporting from multiple outlets says the platform is updating its detection and distribution approach, including using its own systems to identify content that appears AI-generated and to limit how widely it is shown.

Context comes from third-party tracking and internal product changes. A July report cited by outlets using Pangram data found that more than 40% of LinkedIn long-form posts were AI-generated, versus roughly 30% on X and Medium, with smaller shares on Reddit and Substack. LinkedIn has also rolled out features that let users flag posts that “seem like AI slop,” which it says received more than a million clicks within two weeks of launch.

Outlets also describe LinkedIn’s focus on improving model quality and user guidance. LinkedIn says improvements in its detection systems have contributed to a reported 40% decline in views of content classified as AI slop. While LinkedIn is not rejecting AI tools outright, it emphasizes that AI content often underperforms without editing and human tailoring, and it is pairing detection with support efforts for users.