Sourav Ganguly approaches the Delhi High Court seeking interim relief over alleged misuse of his identity and cricketing legacy in the film “Doosra.” He contends the film “exploits” his image without consent. The court asks him to specify which scenes or parts of the movie he considers objectionable before it considers any interim measures.
The makers of “Doosra” oppose the plea, arguing that Ganguly is only a source of inspiration and that the film does not infringe his rights. The two reports focus on the same court process: the court’s procedural direction to identify the allegedly infringing content, and the dispute between Ganguly’s claims and the film’s makers’ defence. One outlet adds an explanatory framing of why Ganguly has moved the court and what the next step in the case requires, while the other concentrates on the court’s instruction and the makers’ response.
