Trump names Stephen Miller to replace Susie Wiles as White House chief of staff

Star Tribune leads with the personnel switch and ties it closely to Republicans’ midterm defeat, emphasizing the rapid timing after Congress changes.

CNBC foregrounds Trump’s statement about Miller replacing Wiles and stresses the midterms context around Democrats winning House and Senate.

Rolling Stone frames the move as Trump’s first major post-midterms action and highlights Miller’s background as an immigration adviser.

BBC emphasizes the replacement happening days after the midterm losses and notes Miller’s close relationship with Trump, including when the role begins.

Washington Examiner focuses on Miller’s current deputy role for policy and presents Trump’s description of him as among his most trusted advisors.

ABC News US leads directly with Wiles out and Miller in, using the announcement as the central detail with limited additional context.

The Independent foregrounds Miller’s immigration-policy role and links the change to the breadth of Republican losses beyond Congress.

Sydney Morning Herald mirrors the common promotion framing—Miller replacing Wiles, trusted-adviser language, and starting Monday—without adding new specifics.

Brisbane Times emphasizes Trump’s promotion framing, including that Miller is a deputy to Wiles and is set to start Monday.

The Age largely repeats the same promotion details found across other outlets, highlighting Miller’s deputy status and start date on Monday.

Deadline emphasizes it as the first major post-midterms shake-up and links the move explicitly to voters’ midterm rebuke.

Daily Signal leads with the breaking staffing change, emphasising that Miller leads Trump’s illegal-immigration crackdown and follows Wiles’s departure.

The New York Times leads with Susie Wiles stepping down as chief of staff, framing Stephen Miller mainly through his role in driving the administration’s immigration crackdown.

CBS News frames the move as the biggest personnel shakeup since the midterms, spotlighting the replacement of Wiles by Miller as a key post-election shift.

NBC focuses on Wiles stepping down within the week and Miller stepping in, treating the announcement as a continuation of Trump’s midterms-era changes.

Financial Times stresses the timing—three days after a bruising midterm defeat—while highlighting the dramatic personnel swap to Miller from Wiles.

Daily Mail spotlights the harsh midterm outcome in its framing (“bloodbath”) while leading with Trump firing Wiles and installing Miller.

The Daily Mail emphasises a personnel shake-up after midterm results, foregrounding Trump replacing Susie Wiles with Stephen Miller and describing it as occurring after a “bloodbath.”

The Hill foregrounds the post-midterms context, tying the Wiles exit and Miller promotion to Republican losses and control shifts in Congress.

New York Post emphasises the cause-and-effect framing—after a midterm blowout Trump replaces Wiles with longtime adviser Miller.

Bloomberg spotlights the political transition, noting Miller’s move into chief of staff while describing Wiles shifting to Trump’s political operation.

Fox News highlights Trump’s praise of Miller as a most-trusted adviser and includes Wiles’s statement, stressing the planned Monday start and her exit.