US offers up to $20 million reward for information on Iran’s nuclear programme

ZeroHedge leads with the CENTCOM/RFJ reward details while framing it as a sign of US desperation and contrasting it with past intelligence efforts in Iraq.

BBC keeps the headline straightforward and emphasises President Trump’s broader threat posture, including the prospect of renewed strikes on nuclear facilities.

Premium Times (Nigeria) foregrounds the administrative mechanism, stating the reward runs through the State Department’s Rewards for Justice programme.

Jowhar.com highlights the $20 million figure in euros and the offer of relocation, while placing it in the context of Trump’s insistence that Iran seeks a deal to end the war.

Middle East Eye leads with CENTCOM’s post and specifies the kind of nuclear-related information sought, adding background on attacks and Trump’s shifting messaging.

Euronews emphasises the stated US rationale referencing the State Department and the IAEA safeguards “continuity of knowledge.”

Cointelegraph leads with US sanctions on Canadian money-exchange firms and then mentions the nuclear reward as an additional related development.

Swarajya frames the story around rising tensions and the search for intelligence, presenting the reward offer as a central development.

IOL (South Africa) foregrounds the apparent contradiction between the reward offer and Trump’s “obliterated” claim about the programme.

Daily Post Nigeria highlights the dispute between the reward announcement and the Trump administration’s prior claim that Iran’s programme was “obliterated.”

The Jerusalem Post spotlights Rewards for Justice’s focus and lists the categories of information sought, including nuclear facilities, equipment, and personnel.

India Today centres straightforwardly on the US announcement of a $20 million reward for information on Iran’s nuclear programme, with limited additional context in the provided summary.

The Mirror leads by focusing on Piers Morgan’s reaction, using the reward announcement as a springboard to highlight the public response.

The Punch leads on the $20m offer while explicitly raising the contradiction with Trump’s “obliterated” claims.

Daily Post Nigeria stresses official attribution, noting CENTCOM’s statement on X and listing the categories of information sought.

Daily Express leads with a mocking, human-interest/celebrity-commentary style approach by highlighting Piers Morgan’s critique of the reward offer.

New York Post emphasises the specific categories sought—nuclear scientists and staff, and programme-related technologies and capabilities—citing the announcement’s posting.

The Hindu stresses that the Rewards for Justice offer provides no specific parameters on what information would trigger the $20 million reward.

NDTV concentrates on the information categories—facilities, equipment, and associated personnel—without highlighting disagreement with administration claims.

Vanguard leads with the CENTCOM-attributed wording about the reward and, in the provided summary, adds unrelated context about mediators and preventing resumption of fighting.

ABC Australia leads with a different figure ($29m) and stresses that Rewards for Justice offers $20m with possible relocation.

Business Line connects the announcement to continuing military tensions, Trump’s assertions about Iran’s nuclear programme, and renewed diplomatic efforts to end hostilities.

Al-Monitor links the reward to the diplomatic and wartime context, including mention of Trump reiterating Iran’s desire to make a deal to end the war.

RTE News leads with the US offer and includes a euro conversion of the reward amount for Irish readers.

RTE News emphasizes the headline figure ($20m) and gives an approximate euro equivalent, keeping the story narrowly on the reward terms.

The South China Morning Post highlights Trump’s comments about Tehran wanting a deal and repeats that “Rewards for Justice” is offering up to US$20 million plus possible relocation.

Fox News emphasizes practical submission details by highlighting that Rewards for Justice accepts tips via Signal or Tor, alongside the $20 million figure.

Times of India focuses on what the reward is intended to gather—facilities, equipment and personnel—and adds that Iran wants negotiations under certain conditions.

Free Malaysia Today stresses that the State Department did not specify what information would qualify for the reward.

Middle East Eye provides the most detailed context in the supplied text, including references to IAEA safeguards loss and stating no specific parameters for what would yield the full reward.

NDTV presents a straightforward restatement of the State Department offer, focusing on the reward and what categories of information it covers.