The U.S. Supreme Court rules against a broad federal prohibition on gun possession by people who use marijuana. The decision, issued on Thursday, follows a case brought by a Texas man who argues it should not be a crime for marijuana users to own firearms. The ruling is described across multiple outlets as part of the Court’s broader pattern of decisions that expand or strengthen firearm rights. While the articles focus on the specific issue involving marijuana use and gun ownership, they characterize the outcome as a narrowing of federal authority in this area. The Court’s action comes in a line of firearm-related cases in which it has shifted the legal balance in favor of gun rights, and the Texas case is presented as the latest example. The reporting characterizes the ruling as a setback for the federal government’s effort to enforce a wide ban tied to marijuana use. Details such as the scope of the limits and how lower courts must apply the decision are not provided in the excerpts, but the consistent theme is that the Supreme Court sides with the petitioner and limits the reach of the federal ban.