The US Supreme Court rules unanimously to narrow the federal law that bars firearm possession by certain illegal drug users. In the case, a Texas man is charged after FBI agents find a handgun in his home during a raid. The man admits he smokes marijuana about every other day and keeps the firearm for self-defense. The federal government prosecutes him under a statute prohibiting gun ownership by “unlawful users” of controlled substances. Writing for the Court, Justice Neil Gorsuch finds the government’s reading of the law is overly broad and violates the Second Amendment because it does not require an adequate link between drug use and dangerousness. The Court rejects the government’s reliance on older historical laws that restricted firearm rights for “habitual drunkards,” saying those laws addressed different people, for different reasons, under different conditions. The Court notes prosecutors do not allege the defendant is addicted, uses the firearm while intoxicated, threatens anyone, or poses a danger. It also points to changes in federal and state marijuana policies, including steps to reduce enforcement and move marijuana to a less restrictive schedule.
US Supreme Court narrows federal ban on firearm ownership by regular marijuana users
The US Supreme Court rules unanimously to narrow the federal law that bars firearm possession by certain illegal drug users. In the case, a Texas man is charged after FBI agents find a handgun in his...
- The Supreme Court rules unanimously that the federal firearm ban cannot be applied broadly to all illegal drug users.
- The case involves a Texas defendant who admits regular marijuana use and keeps a handgun for self-defense.
- The Court holds the government’s interpretation violates the Second Amendment by not requiring a sufficient connection to dangerousness.
- The Court rejects the government’s analogy to historical “habitual drunkards” laws as too different in scope and operation.
- The opinion notes prosecutors do not allege addiction, firearm use while intoxicated, threats, or other danger-related facts.
Justices side with a casual marijuana user challenging his ban under legislation used to prosecute Hunter Biden
13 hours agoThe Supreme Court unanimously struck down a law banning "habitual" marijuana users from owning firearms on Thursday.The court ruled the law, which was used to prosecute Hunter Biden, was overly broad and improperly deprived individuals of their right to possess a firearm in their homes.The case involved a Texas man charged with a felony when FBI agents raiding his home found a handgun he kept for self-defense, and he also admitted to smoking marijuana every other day.In an opinion written by Justice Neil Gorsuch, the court held that the government's prosecution of Ali Hemani under a federal law prohibiting firearm possession by unlawful users of controlled substances violated the Second Amendment. Two justices, Samuel Alito and Elena Kagan, concurred only in the judgment.The federal government argued that people who regularly use illegal drugs could be disarmed based on historical laws that restricted the rights of so-called "habitual drunkards," but the court said the old laws the government relied on were too different from the modern gun restriction to justify it."The government's analogy fails under every measure it asks us to consider," Gorsuch wrote. "The historical laws on which it relies targeted different kinds of people, did so for different reasons, and operated in different ways."The court said the old laws focused on people whose substance abuse left them unable to manage their lives, while the federal law broadly covered regular drug users regardless of whether they posed a threat to anyone.Gorsuch noted that prosecutors never alleged Hemani was addicted to marijuana, had used a firearm while intoxicated, threatened anyone, or posed a danger to himself or others. Instead, the government relied solely on his admission that he used marijuana "about every other day."The opinion also questioned the government's argument that marijuana users are categorically dangerous, pointing to the federal government's own actions in reducing marijuana enforcement and efforts to move marijuana to a less restrictive drug schedule. The court noted that most states now permit some form of marijuana use."The federal government has not just tolerated them; it helped fuel them," Gorsuch wrote of the growth in marijuana use and legalization across the country.
15 hours agoThe Supreme Court ruled unanimously that a federal gun law cannot be broadly applied to all illegal drug users, siding with a Texas man who admitted to regularly using marijuana while keeping a firearm for self-defense.
15 hours ago
Rex Heuermann sentenced to life terms for Gilgo Beach serial murders
Rex Heuermann, a Manhattan architect, is sentenced in New York for the Gilgo Beach serial killings. Multiple outlets rep...
Quarantine ends for most on board MV Hondius after hantavirus outbreak
Most passengers and crew on the MV Hondius are no longer in quarantine following an outbreak of hantavirus that prompted...
FDA advisory panel recommends Moderna’s mRNA flu shot for older adults
An independent Food and Drug Administration (FDA) advisory panel votes to recommend approval of Moderna’s mRNA-based inf...