Multiple reports focus on an effort by New York Attorney General Letitia James to gain expanded powers that could affect groups viewed as engaging in union-related communications practices. The articles state that James is pursuing “sweeping new powers” that would allow the attorney general to take action against organizations she determines have used communications methods she characterizes as impersonation of a union. The claim described is that certain groups allegedly “falsely impersonate a union,” prompting the attorney general to target them under proposed or forthcoming legal authority. The reporting frames the issue as one involving communications and whether they create the appearance of union affiliation, rather than a dispute over specific labor actions. One perspective included in the coverage comes from a group leader who says unions and their advocates are placing a target on their back because they help members “escape,” though the underlying allegations being discussed relate to the attorney general’s assessment of the groups’ communications. Across the sources, the main points are the planned expansion of James’s enforcement authority and the use of that authority to address alleged union-impersonation conduct.