The U.S. Supreme Court issues a unanimous ruling addressing how the Second Amendment applies to a federal anti-drug firearm prohibition. Multiple reports characterize the decision as clarifying that the government’s interest in combating drugs does not automatically override constitutional limits on firearm possession. The Court’s ruling holds that the challenged restriction cannot stand as applied, because it conflicts with Second Amendment protections. The outlets describe the outcome as a narrow but significant step, emphasizing that laws criminalizing conduct involving firearms must align with the Constitution rather than rely solely on policy concerns about drug enforcement. The decision is presented as unanimous, with the Court rejecting the lower approach that treated the anti-drug justification as sufficient to uphold the restriction. While the reporting focuses on the Second Amendment portion of the decision, it frames the Court’s action as a boundary-setting measure: the federal government may not impose firearm-related penalties in a way that disregards constitutional rights. The sources do not indicate any split among justices.