Multiple outlets publish an opinion-style piece arguing that “patriotism” is increasingly treated as a negative term and that the political figure Pauline Hanson should not be seen as the sole owner of “love for our country.” The writers contend that for some Australians, the history implied by “the colony” of Australia makes the nation’s story feel irredeemable, and therefore not a place that some people feel they should support through “living in and fighting for.” Across the articles, the central theme is the question of who can legitimately claim patriotism and national affection, and how historical and political associations influence public perceptions of that concept. The pieces do not present new reporting or disputed facts about events; instead, they focus on how language, identity, and historical framing shape attitudes toward patriotism. Overall, they express that patriotism should not be monopolised by any one politician, and that different Australians’ historical experiences can affect whether they view the nation as something worth defending.