The Delhi High Court on Wednesday declined to grant interim protection under a “personality rights” claim filed by BJP MP Raghav Chadha, but directed social media platforms to remove five specific posts. Justice Subramonium Prasad said the case, at this stage, does not involve a violation of personality rights, which are typically linked to control over commercial exploitation of a person’s identity, name, or image. Several outlets report that the court instead treated the dispute primarily as a defamation issue.
Across coverage, the court is described as ordering limited takedowns rather than a blanket removal of all content Chadha had flagged. It directed removal of five posts it found prima facie defamatory. Other flagged content was characterized as satire or criticism of political decisions and, the court said, does not automatically become defamatory simply because it is offensive or aimed at a public figure.
The posts alleged that Chadha “sold himself for money” and related claims tied to his switch from the Aam Aadmi Party to the BJP. The court also indicated that some content went beyond “harmless satirical humour,” including material described as profane or vulgar, and the order addressed platform obligations regarding the content’s links and related account information.