All three outlets publish the same opinion text, framed as a personal reflection on sports fandom. The author argues that the idea “whatever happens, a side you love will win” reflects a certain moral or emotional perspective, contrasting it with the writer’s own approach. The piece presents sport as a “zero-sum game,” in which outcomes matter because one side’s success implies another side’s loss. From that premise, the author says the experience of fandom can become “complicated” and emotionally intense, describing the “agony” that comes with caring deeply about results. Rather than reporting events, the article focuses on the internal logic of rooting for a team, the tensions that arise when supporters think in win-or-lose terms, and the contrast between the author’s feelings and the more universally accepting sentiment attributed to others. As an opinion piece, it does not provide verifiable factual claims about a specific match or competition; it centers on the writer’s views about how sports rivalry shapes emotion and identity.