Two South African court decisions reject urgent applications seeking to stop a cardiologist’s TikTok posts. In Pietermaritzburg High Court, the court dismisses an urgent bid aimed at halting the cardiologist’s TikTok content, finding insufficient grounds for the immediate relief requested. Separately, the Durban High Court also rejects an urgent request to interdict the cardiologist from continuing to publish on TikTok. In both matters, the applicants seek emergency court orders rather than final determinations, indicating that they argue the posts pose an ongoing risk that requires immediate intervention. The court decisions differ in location but are aligned in outcome: both courts refuse to grant the urgent relief to stop the TikTok videos. The reported summaries do not provide detailed reasoning, the specific allegations against the cardiologist, or what the cardiologist is said to have posted. Overall, the available reporting indicates that courts do not consider the threshold for urgent interdicts to have been met at this stage, leaving the dispute unresolved and subject to further legal processes.