The three outlets publish the same opinion-style argument calling for limits on how big tech and AI systems use creative works created by individuals and families. The author says their family has invested significant time, effort, and personal commitment into making art, and argues that large technology companies should not profit from that work without permission from the rights holders. The piece raises concerns that AI technologies and related platforms may reproduce, train on, or otherwise monetize creative content in ways that bypass the consent of creators. It frames the issue as one of control and compensation for original work, emphasizing that the value of art is tied to the people who produced it. Across the sources, the central claim is that creators should have a say in whether their art is used and whether they receive payment when it contributes to commercial products or services. The articles do not provide new reported details about specific legal cases or enforcement actions; instead, they focus on the broader policy and rights question of consent and remuneration in the context of big tech and AI.