Reactions to a proposed peerage for London Mayor Sadiq Khan are reported as sharply divided across political circles in the capital. Multiple outlets describe strong, contrasting responses from figures who support the move and those who oppose it, reflecting wider debates about the role and influence of the House of Lords and the appointment of political peers. Reporting highlights that criticism and praise are both framed in political terms, with some commentators characterizing the peerage as appropriate recognition for a senior elected official, while others argue it is unnecessary or misaligned with public expectations. Supporters and opponents also disagree on whether the decision would improve or undermine democratic accountability and governance. The coverage indicates that the controversy centers less on the procedural fact of a peerage itself and more on what it symbolizes, with some viewing it as a move that rewards political service and others seeing it as a sign of established political arrangements. Overall, the story reflects a broader split among London politicians about whether a mayor transitioning to the Lords is beneficial or problematic.