A traffic stop involving a New Hampshire Democratic lawmaker traveling at about 107 mph is again drawing attention to body-camera availability and oversight, according to multiple reports. The sheriff’s office that handled the stop does not have body cameras or dashboard cameras, citing funding shortfalls. The situation revives an ongoing debate over whether inadequate recording equipment affects public trust and transparency in law enforcement interactions. While the reports focus on the recording gap, they also point to the broader issue of how departments obtain and maintain camera systems, including costs for hardware, storage, and related policies. The attention on this incident comes as lawmakers and advocacy groups continue to argue for clearer rules requiring video recording in certain stops and circumstances. The coverage describes the lack of cameras as central to the dispute surrounding the stop and related questions about accountability, rather than emphasizing a specific ruling or outcome tied directly to video evidence.