Two outlets criticize the New York Times’ coverage related to Israel and argue it contains libelous statements. The New York Post frames what it calls an “ongoing” campaign as normalizing and promoting claims that, in its view, are defamatory toward Israel. Real Clear Politics repeats a similar characterization, saying the New York Times’ reporting reflects a “libelous campaign” and describes it as continuing. Across both sources, the central allegation is not a specific court finding or documented legal determination, but that the publication’s narratives and wording about Israel are inappropriate and defamatory. Neither source provides detailed sourcing or specific examples in the text provided here. As presented, the articles function as opinion and criticism about the New York Times’ editorial approach rather than as a report of verified legal outcomes. The points of agreement are the claim that the New York Times’ coverage is defamatory and that such alleged content is continuing, while broader evidence, context, and counterarguments are not included in the material supplied.