The reports describe a case in which a mother says she loses contact with her son after a custody arrangement is made through family court processes. The Daily Mail focuses on a mother identified as Erin*, whose son Dylan was taken from her when he was nine years old. The article says Erin was barred from all contact with Dylan and his sister for six years, and attributes the outcome to the family courts following advice from an unregulated psychologist. The piece also suggests the situation is not isolated, implying there are other similar cases involving family court decisions influenced by psychological assessments. The article indicates Erin had not seen her son for six years until last November. It portrays her as now able to see him again. The coverage does not provide detailed information about the underlying evidence, the specific court proceedings, or the psychologist’s credentials, and it presents the claims from the mother’s perspective. The reports therefore emphasize the alleged impact of custody decisions and the role of psychological advice in those decisions, without substantiating additional specifics within the provided text.