Jurors in the rape trial of a high-profile businessman are being urged to reject arguments that the complainant’s account is fabricated or driven by an “ulterior motive.” According to reports, legal representatives tell jurors that they should not accept the defence’s suggestion that the alleged victim invented her allegations. The commentary focuses on the credibility of the complainant’s evidence, with the prosecution urging jurors to assess the testimony without being persuaded by claims of hidden intent. The reports describe the urging as part of the trial proceedings, where jurors are expected to determine the facts based on the evidence presented in court. Both outlets cover the same thrust of the submission: that the complainant’s narrative is presented as genuine and should be weighed accordingly, rather than dismissed as an engineered story. The articles do not provide additional detail on the underlying allegations, the timeline of events, or the specific evidence discussed beyond the challenge to the complainant’s credibility.