Stefanie de Saude-Darbandi, an immigration lawyer who represents Chidimma Adetshina, is facing public scrutiny related to her involvement with South Africa’s Immigration Advisory Board. The reported issue centers on her holding a dual role: acting as legal counsel while also serving in an advisory capacity. The matter is being discussed by members of the public and commentators, with attention focused on whether such overlap raises concerns about independence, conflict of interest, or procedure. At the same time, the court process is described as continuing without major developments in the Cape Town Regional Court, while reactions outside the courtroom intensify. The reporting frames the controversy as part of a wider public debate rather than as an adjudicated finding within the court at that moment. No final determination is described in the provided account, but the scrutiny highlights the potential governance and ethical questions raised when legal representatives also hold positions connected to government-facing advisory structures.