A psychologist argues that the idea women can simply leave abusive relationships is overly simplistic. The articles, which share the same theme across outlets, say that when partners harm or threaten women, many victims do not make the decision to leave immediately. Instead, the decision can come after a prolonged period shaped by factors such as ongoing risk, coercion, and the practical and psychological barriers faced in the relationship. The commentary responds to public advice associated with Pauline Hanson, suggesting that real-world domestic violence situations involve complex dynamics rather than a single choice. Across the reports, the central point is that leaving is often the final decision victims make rather than a straightforward or immediate one. The articles present this as an explanation grounded in clinical experience, highlighting that threats and safety concerns can affect timing, planning, and willingness to exit a relationship. Overall, the pieces emphasize that domestic violence is not resolved by simplistic instructions and that victims’ circumstances can determine when they are able to leave.