Uber is reinstating a driver it had banned after the Fair Work Commission (FWC) finds Uber did not prove allegations about the driver’s conduct. Across the cases, the company faced 12 complaints that alleged behaviours including spitting, swearing, inappropriate touching and speeding. The driver was previously banned, but the matter is determined through an FWC review. While the complaints describe multiple incidents, the Commission concludes Uber fails to substantiate the alleged behaviour to the standard required for maintaining the ban. In response to the decision, Uber publicly criticises the regulatory process, arguing that the legal and industrial framework governing the dispute is not aligned with how such cases should be assessed. However, the core outcome reported by all sources is the same: the FWC order results in the driver’s reinstatement. The reporting does not indicate that the underlying allegations are confirmed; instead, it says the Commission rules in favour of the driver on evidentiary grounds and requires Uber to restore access to driving work through its platform.