Architects working on a heritage home make changes intended to reduce the sense that the property is being presented as a museum, according to reports from The Age, the Sydney Morning Herald, and the Brisbane Times. The coverage says the architects were aware from the start that the house should not feel like a preserved exhibit, nor should the design become a parody of its original form. Instead, the revisions aim to keep the building’s heritage qualities while making it more comfortable and lived-in for residents. One recurring detail across the articles is the suggestion that occupants “wear puffer jackets inside,” a line used to highlight the practical, day-to-day reality of the home’s atmosphere and living conditions after the tweak. While the sources focus on the intent behind the modifications—making the home feel functional rather than staged—the reports collectively present the same overarching message: the changes are guided by an effort to balance heritage preservation with contemporary usability. The accounts do not indicate a change in ownership or a broader policy shift, concentrating instead on the design approach for this specific heritage property.