Two new papers from the AGORA High-resolution Galaxy Simulations Comparison Project analyze how different simulation codes and stellar feedback models affect the outcome of a major galaxy merger in a Milky Way-mass galaxy progenitor at redshift z ≈ 4.5. Using the AGORA CosmoRun suite, the authors run cosmological zoom-in hydrodynamic simulations with nine calibrated codes, each implementing a different stellar feedback scheme. In the first study, they find that the star formation rate (SFR) response during the merger depends strongly on the feedback type. Kinetic feedback produces an intense merger-induced starburst that peaks and begins to subside before coalescence, while purely thermal feedback without kinetic components yields more prolonged SFR growth after coalescence. Feedback approaches based on delayed cooling or radiation pressure generate SFR that varies more strongly from time to time. Tracking gas in particle-based simulations shows that kinetic feedback enables earlier gas inflow from the secondary to the primary galaxy between first periapsis and apoapsis, strengthening and advancing the starburst; thermal/delayed-cooling-style feedback suppresses cooling and spreads gas out, reducing burst strength. The second study links these differences to morphology: kinetic feedback initiates disc formation and compaction earlier (around first periapsis), whereas thermal feedback forms a compact disc mainly near/after coalescence, and strong delayed-cooling/superbubble feedback leads to a more extended remnant. Remnant disc orientation is code-independent, and disc angular momentum aligns with the interaction’s orbital angular momentum rather than the pre-merger spin. Comparisons with a semi-analytic model show reasonable agreement in stellar mass and half-mass radius but systematic offsets in dark matter fraction and velocity dispersion linked to compaction versus expansion.