The Supreme Court makes an observation that police cannot use lathicharge merely because there is public agitation. Citing the reports, the Court’s remark highlights that the mere presence of unrest or protests does not automatically justify the use of force. The focus is on the need for lawful and proportionate action by authorities, rather than applying coercive measures as a default response.
While the provided sources do not include detailed factual background or specific case particulars, they agree on the core message attributed to the Court: authorities should not resort to lathicharge solely on the basis that crowds are agitated. The statement is presented as a caution against automatic escalation and as a reminder that enforcement actions must follow legal standards.
Taken together, the outlets report the same principle from the Supreme Court, emphasizing that law enforcement tactics require more than just the existence of agitation; they must be grounded in appropriate justification under applicable law.
