The Kerala High Court rules that a husband’s non-payment of maintenance amounts to “economic abuse,” which falls within the definition of domestic violence under the relevant law. The court upholds an order directing monthly maintenance payments, rejecting arguments that the issue should not be treated as domestic violence. It also affirms compensation for the wife’s emotional distress, indicating that neglect in providing financial support can cause harm beyond mere financial deprivation. The court further observes that claims of domestic violence do not require independent corroboration in cases where the abuse typically occurs within the private setting of a home, making direct evidence difficult to obtain. In its reasoning, the court emphasizes that an able-bodied husband is obligated to support his family and cannot avoid responsibility by citing financial or other excuses when maintenance is legally due.