The Centre argues that the Delhi High Court does not have jurisdiction to stop the eviction process involving the Delhi Gymkhana Club. According to the Centre’s position, the court cannot issue orders that would pause or halt the eviction, implying that legal authority for such action lies elsewhere or under different proceedings. The dispute is framed as an “eviction” matter connected to the Gymkhana Club, and the government’s submission focuses on limits of the High Court’s power at this stage. Both reports indicate that the Central government’s response to the High Court action is that any stay or suspension of eviction would be beyond the court’s competence. The matter is presented as an ongoing legal confrontation between the club’s position and the government’s actions related to eviction. The reports do not detail the underlying reasons for eviction, the specific timeline, or the club’s legal claims, but they consistently highlight the Centre’s core argument on jurisdiction and the ability of the court to intervene.