Anglo American’s copper operations have received responsible sourcing certification, highlighting efforts to monitor labor practices in its supply chain. Reporting notes that these certifications are presented as evidence of compliance with social and ethical sourcing expectations. However, critics argue that voluntary or certification-based approaches are not sufficient to guarantee enforceable protection of human rights, including protections for children. The debate centers on oversight and accountability: who conducts monitoring, what standards apply, and how violations are addressed when they occur. Supporters of responsible sourcing say audit and monitoring mechanisms help identify and reduce risks in mining and related sourcing. Opponents contend that certification schemes may lack the legal force needed to ensure effective remedies, especially where child labour concerns persist in broader industry contexts. Overall, the story frames responsible sourcing certification as part of a wider governance question—how monitoring is structured, whether it is independently verified, and what enforcement mechanisms exist beyond voluntary compliance. The issue remains whether current monitoring systems can reliably detect and prevent child labour in copper mining and its supply chain.