Two Alberta petition efforts face questions about how signatures are verified. Water Not Coal petitioner Corb Lund says his petition is rejected and has launched a legal challenge against the decision, arguing the rejection should be reconsidered. Separately, separatist petitioner Mitch Sylvestre is also challenging the process by seeking a legislative review rather than pursuing the matter through the courts. The reports describe both actions as responses to verification procedures used to determine whether petition signatures meet the requirements for advancing an initiative. While the petitioners back different causes, both contend that the steps taken to confirm signatures are flawed and warrant additional scrutiny. The current disputes focus on the administrative verification of signatures and the pathway available to petitioners who believe their submissions were incorrectly rejected. The outcomes of Lund’s legal challenge and Sylvestre’s request for legislative review are not reported in the provided sources.