Charlamagne tha God says he finds it “fishy” and “suspicious” that Dr. Anthony Fauci repeatedly invoked the Fifth Amendment at a Senate hearing after receiving a pardon. Speaking on The Breakfast Club, Charlamagne argues that if no wrongdoing occurred, Fauci would not have needed a pardon and would not have relied on the Fifth during questioning. The comments focus on the apparent contradiction between the pardon and Fauci’s decision to avoid answering specific questions at the hearing. Charlamagne frames his concern as a lack of understanding of the circumstances surrounding the pardon and the later testimony. The outlets report that Charlamagne’s remarks do not include new evidence or allegations about specific conduct, but instead question the logic of the sequence: a pardon followed by continued refusals to answer under the Fifth Amendment during congressional scrutiny.