Former Supreme Court Justice Mary Odili says some Nigerian judges avoid punishment because petitions brought against them often lack “raw” or material evidence. Speaking at the South East regional security summit in Umuahia, Odili says the National Judicial Council (NJC) considers petitions against judicial officers, including corruption-related complaints, but will only sanction a judge when the petition contains credible facts and sufficient proof. She argues that petitions that are presented “in a watery form,” without supporting details, make it easier for accused judges to defend themselves and clear the allegations during the process. Odili also emphasizes the accused judicial officer’s right to fair hearing, stating that weak allegations do not translate into verified misconduct. She urges citizens who are dissatisfied with judicial conduct or court outcomes to submit complaints to the NJC, but to include concrete evidence to ensure the petition can be properly handled and verified. Odili’s remarks focus on the evidentiary requirements for action by the NJC rather than on any specific case.