The Johannesburg High Court recalls a default order that would have allowed Nedbank to repossess a customer’s financed vehicle. The matter concerns a hearing in which the client arrives at court shortly after judgment is granted in her absence. As a result, the court originally issued an order permitting repossession. The court later reviews that outcome and recalls the order, indicating that the default decision should not stand in its original form. The court’s action means the repossession authority granted under the earlier default judgment is withdrawn pending further proceedings. The report focuses on the timing of the client’s appearance relative to the granting of judgment and the subsequent legal effect on the bank’s repossession rights. No further details are provided in the supplied material regarding the merits of the underlying finance dispute or any conditions the court may impose in the resumed matter. The decision reflects the court’s power to correct or withdraw default-related orders when procedural circumstances warrant reconsideration.