In testimony at the Madlanga Commission, IDAC official Serunye says his understanding of the Dineo Mokwele case has changed after hearing evidence so far. He argues that the material presented to the commission leads him to believe he and junior prosecutor Joy Hlatshwayo were drawn into an investigation they should not have been part of. Serunye maintains that the evidence has “fundamentally” altered his perspective, and he describes his role in the matter as being the subject of a setup.
The commission hearing focuses on allegations and processes surrounding the Mokwele matter, including how individuals became involved and what the investigative and prosecutorial basis was. Serunye’s account highlights his contention that events and evidence do not align with what he previously believed about the case’s legitimacy and the proper conduct of those involved. The statement reflects his view that he and Hlatshwayo were implicated through circumstances that, in his assessment, should have prevented their participation in the investigation.
