An anti-slavery advocate targets NSW Nationals leader Gurmesh Singh, rejecting claims that he had questions to answer about his knowledge of modern slavery risks on berry farms. All three reports describe a dispute in which the advocate argues Singh had been “on notice” for years regarding the issues, while Singh responds by fiercely rejecting the allegations. The reporting focuses on Singh’s denial of any obligation or culpability related to awareness of modern slavery risks in the supply chain connected to berry farming. The accounts agree on the central elements of the controversy: the advocate’s assertion of long-standing warning and the Nationals leader’s firm rejection of the criticism. While the articles emphasize the tone of the exchange—particularly Singh’s response—they do not provide extensive shared details beyond the core allegation, the “on notice for years” framing, and the denial. The story is presented as a public confrontation over responsibility and awareness concerning modern slavery risks in the berry industry.