Multiple reports describe economist commentary supporting Federal Reserve nominee Kevin Warsh’s approach to limit or remove policy guidance offered to markets. The articles say Warsh’s proposal is aimed at preventing markets from over-relying on forward-looking statements from the central bank, rather than on incoming economic data and actual policy decisions. The economist cited in the coverage argues there are three main reasons Warsh is correct to “nix” or scale back Fed guidance, though the reports keep the specific reasoning broad. The commentary also identifies a potential action Warsh could take to help calm markets, suggesting that while reducing guidance may create uncertainty in the short term, clear communication tied to observable policy intentions could mitigate volatility. Across the sources, the common theme is that Warsh would change how the Fed communicates about future policy, shifting emphasis away from signaling and toward outcomes. The reports do not describe a final decision by the Fed, but they frame the comments as an argument for why altering guidance could better support the central bank’s policy credibility.