Psychiatrists say court suppression and secrecy orders can carry mental-health consequences for accused people, potentially comparable to the effects of having their names published. The comments come after recent high-profile criminal cases involving rapists Tom Silvagni and Ralph Carr brought increased attention to safety suppression orders. Experts argue that the experience of being held under court secrecy—such as restrictions on public identification and the ongoing legal process—can contribute to psychological distress, including anxiety and stress. They note that the relationship between publicity and wellbeing is complex and may vary between individuals, rather than assuming that public exposure is always the most harmful outcome. The outlets also report that psychiatrists are urging a more balanced assessment of when suppression orders are necessary and how they affect defendants’ mental health. While suppression orders are intended to protect privacy and safety, the experts’ position is that courts should consider potential mental impacts alongside the stated aims of these orders.