Roman Cabanac’s claim for about R5 million for unfair dismissal collapses after a security-clearance ruling, according to reports. Cabanac argues that his dismissal was unfair and that he is entitled to compensation. He contends that his departure from his position followed political pressure connected to his appointment. The outcome hinges on the security-clearance decision, which prevents the matter from proceeding in the form Cabanac sought. As a result, his bid to challenge the dismissal and recover damages does not move forward. The reports present the case as centering on the intersection between employment-related unfair dismissal claims and access to security information or suitability requirements. While Cabanac maintains that political pressure contributed to his exit, the ruling on security clearance determines the procedural viability of his claim and leads to its collapse. The case therefore ends at least temporarily or definitively at the stage affected by the clearance decision, rather than being resolved on the merits of the alleged unfair dismissal and motivations behind his termination.