A former athlete appearing in connection with allegations involving television presenter Alan Jones says his evidence has changed during extensive questioning, but he denies reports that the changes were prompted by news coverage. Both outlets describe how the witness’s testimony shifts over time after “mammoth” examination, acknowledging that his account is not static. However, the athlete maintains that he is not lying and rejects the suggestion that external factors—such as being influenced by media reports—led him to alter his statements.
The reporting indicates the dispute centres on the credibility and timing of the witness’s changed evidence rather than on a single new claim. The athlete’s position is that the evolution of his testimony reflects his answers during questioning, while the denial addresses an alleged motive for dishonest alteration. The article framing emphasises the contrast between the witness’s admission that his testimony has changed and his insistence that he has not been prompted to mislead the court or investigators.
