Federal prosecutors revise charges against Jonathan Rinderknecht, the man accused of starting last year’s deadly Palisades fire, after a federal court mistrial earlier this summer. Prosecutors file a new indictment that removes one of the three felony counts from the original case and modifies the remaining two counts.

The outlets describe the federal government as changing its approach following the mistrial, but they align on the main procedural outcome: the government drops one charge and reshapes the others. One report notes the indictment is adjusted so the revised case reflects two separate fires, rather than the broader framing used in the earlier charging document. Another report also characterizes the update as a revamp of the federal charges, with prosecutors “nixing” one count and revising the other two after the failed trial.

Both accounts focus on the same defendant and the same sequence—mistrial, then a new indictment with narrowed and reorganized charges—while offering limited detail on how the legal theory or evidence presentation differs beyond the change in count structure.