Vusimuzi “Cat” Matlala testifies at the Madlanga Commission, reiterating that he is “entitled to be presumed innocent until proven guilty.” In the hearing, he makes clear that he is responding to allegations raised in proceedings and frames his position in terms of the legal principle of innocence pending proof.
The reporting focuses primarily on Matlala’s statement during the commission session. With limited detail across the provided sources, outlets do not substantially diverge on events themselves, but they emphasize the same key message: Matlala’s stance on how he should be regarded during the inquiry. The articles referenced present the testimony as occurring within the commission’s broader mandate, without adding consistent specifics on the allegations’ substance or the commission’s next steps.
