The Orioles question a video review outcome after a Pete Alonso drive against the New York Yankees is ruled foul and that ruling is upheld, costing Baltimore a potential home run late in the game. Multiple reports say the Orioles were surprised that the call stood even after review.
Baltimore’s reaction centers on the idea that more advanced technology is available to prevent incorrect outcomes and clarify whether the ball traveled over the fence. The accounts describe the Orioles’ frustration as “cry foul,” noting that they believe the situation should be resolvable given existing tools used in baseball officiating.
While the outlets agree on the central dispute—Alonso’s near-homer and the review result—they differ mainly in how they frame the Orioles’ grievance. One report emphasizes the Orioles’ call for greater use of technology, while another focuses on the immediate controversy and the impact of the review decision on a critical moment.
