Donald Trump’s top aide, Natalie Harp, is at the center of fresh questions after reports say she worked in the White House for more than a year without obtaining the routine security clearance other staff receive. Multiple sources cited by MS Now and repeated by other outlets say it was unclear why she did not complete the required paperwork earlier.
According to reporting, White House counsel and security officials raised concerns about Harp’s access and proximity to the president, and the issue prompted intervention by Trump. The New Republic describes the clearance gap as one of several “red flags” raised by staff and links it to broader concerns about how vetting and clearance processes were handled across the administration.
The Guardian highlights the same basic facts—Harp served for roughly a year without the clearance—and quotes an ex-White House ethics official calling it “shocking.” While outlets agree on the core timeline and the uncertainty over why forms were not filed, they differ in emphasis: some focus on the ethics and access implications, while others frame the episode as part of a wider pattern involving other clearance-related decisions and waivers.