Several outlets publish a similar feature ranking or highlighting airports described as among the world’s least convenient for travellers, focusing on how difficult they are to reach from city centres. The pieces single out Melbourne Airport as a local example, noting it is about 23 kilometres from Melbourne and that it lacks a train connection. The articles then position Melbourne’s situation as relatively better compared with other airports discussed in the feature, which are presented as even more inconvenient due to greater distance from major urban areas and limited or less direct transport links. Although the outlets share the same overall premise and framing, they do not provide detailed, consistent reporting in the excerpts provided about specific foreign airports included in the broader comparison, nor do they list precise travel times or transport options for each location. Across the sources, the common thread is that airport accessibility—especially distance and availability of public transport—shapes how convenient airports feel for passengers travelling to and from hotels and city centres. The articles are written in a comparative, travel-oriented style.