Three outlets publish a data-focused analysis questioning claims that e-bikes are the main or greatest threat to pedestrians in Sydney. The articles argue that public concern has been driven more by perception than by a careful look at recorded figures. While they do not treat e-bikes as risk-free, the reporting emphasizes that the available statistics are used to contextualise where pedestrian harm comes from and how often different types of riders or vehicles are involved. A common theme across the three pieces is that attention on e-bikes can narrow the conversation and distract from other contributors to pedestrian injuries, including dangerous driving more broadly. The articles also suggest that e-bikes have potential benefits, such as helping more people cycle and improving transport options, and therefore should be assessed alongside those positives rather than through alarmist framing. Overall, the coverage presents the same core question—whether e-bikes are uniquely dangerous to pedestrians—then answers it by urging readers to rely on measured outcomes rather than broad claims.