Andrew Tate’s lawyers say the former influencer exaggerated claims and did not own the supercars shown in recent photographs. They argue the images should not be taken as proof that Tate possessed or controlled the vehicles depicted.
The comments come as prosecutors oppose bail for Tate and his brother Tristan. Prosecutors say both men pose a flight risk and should remain in custody as the case proceeds. Different outlets focus on separate aspects of the dispute: one highlights the challenge to the authenticity and meaning of the supercar photos, while another emphasizes the bail arguments presented to the court.
Taken together, the reporting shows an ongoing legal confrontation in which the defence counters specific claims tied to evidence, while the prosecution seeks to prevent release by arguing risk factors. The issue of the supercars is presented by the lawyers as an exaggeration and misunderstanding, while the bail hearing centres on whether the brothers can be trusted to attend future court proceedings.
