Lebeya is appearing before the Madlanga Commission after questions are raised about alleged inaction related to a person of interest, Senona, in connection with the Port Shepstone drug theft case. According to the report, Lebeya states that Senona was never subjected to a polygraph test, and that no disciplinary or investigative action is taken against him despite his status as a person of interest.
The account focuses on procedure and accountability, centring on whether the commission can determine why certain investigative steps were not carried out and why Senona was not acted upon. The coverage provided here highlights Lebeya’s admissions about the lack of a polygraph test and the absence of action, but does not include other outlets’ accounts or differing interpretations of the events. As presented, the key issue is the gap between Senona’s designation and the measures reportedly applied in the case.
No additional sources were provided to confirm further details, timelines, or the commission’s subsequent findings.
