A couple buys an early 18th-century home on Lake Como and then discovers that the property needs far more renovation than they expected. The house, built in 1719, is described as offering a notable view, but it also has significant condition issues that make the renovation a major undertaking.
Both outlets report that Tess and Tom have taken on the work to restore the property, framing the situation as a “mammoth” project. Coverage focuses primarily on the scale of the work required after the purchase, rather than on any specific renovation timeline, contractors, or costs. The sources align on the basic facts: the home’s age and location, the couple’s decision to proceed with renovation, and the gap between their initial expectations and what they find once they begin assessing the building.
While both articles use similar language emphasizing unexpected difficulties, neither source provides additional, independently reported details about the extent of structural damage or permitting issues.
