OpenAI CEO Sam Altman publicly supports the idea of “pacing” AI development, arguing that cutting-edge models should not advance faster than humans can maintain control through alignment and safety monitoring. Bloomberg reports that Altman frames pacing as a way to ensure oversight keeps up with capability gains.

Other coverage emphasizes the “pacing, not stopping” distinction. Altman says he does not call for halting progress, but for accepting a slower pace when safety interventions—such as monitoring and evaluation—carry real costs. He also links pacing to responsibility concerns, saying U.S. competitive pressure should not justify recklessness.

Additional reporting provides broader context for the concept’s emergence across major AI labs and industry leaders, noting recent statements that align with deliberate pacing approaches for AI safety and alignment. Free Press Journal describes Altman’s arguments about avoiding loss of control and preventing excessive concentration of power in a few actors, while mentioning OpenAI’s use of “safety cases” ahead of major capability-boosting training runs and the potential for shared standards or independent audits. Free Malaysia Today echoes Altman’s view that competitive pressure should not outweigh alignment and monitoring.